This content is not available in your region

Which animals will suffer most from extreme climate change - and which will survive? 

The new study can be used to make predictions for species not directly included in the research, such as this sugar glider possum.
The new study can be used to make predictions for species not directly included in the research, such as this sugar glider possum.   -   Copyright  Canva
By Charlotte Elton

Llamas, bears and elephants are more likely to withstand climate change than mice and lemmings, according to a new study.

This is because they live longer and have fewer offspring, University of Southern Denmark researchers have found.

As extreme weather events become more common, all animals will feel the heat - but some are more vulnerable than others.

“We can see a clear pattern,” says biologist Owen Jones, one of the study’s authors.

“Animals that live a long time and have few offspring are less vulnerable when extreme weather hits than animals that live for a short time and have many offspring.

“Examples are llamas, long-lived bats and elephants versus mice, possums and rare marsupials such as the Woylie.”

Llamas are one of the species well placed to withstand extreme weather events, according to a new studyCanva

Which species can withstand climate change best?

Over the past 10 years, researchers analysed population fluctuations in 157 mammal populations.

After cross-checking this data with information on extreme weather events, they determined which species have the best survival odds.

The African elephant, Siberian tiger, chimpanzee, greater horseshoe bat, llama, vicuña and white rhinoceros are likely to survive heavy rainfall or prolonged drought.

Chimpanzees - and other large mammals with long life spans - are more likely to withstand extreme weather eventscanva

So too are the grizzly bear, American bison, klipspringer and Schreibers's bat.

On the other hand, extreme weather will hit the Azara's grass mouse, olive grass mouse, elegant fat-tailed mouse opossum and Canadian lemming hard.

The Tundra vole, Arctic fox, stoat, common shrew, woylie and arctic ground squirrel will also struggle.

This is because short-lived animals are more vulnerable to short-term population changes.

For example, a drought might decimate a mice population by destroying most of its food. Many of its reproductive members may perish before the drought is over.

In comparison, larger mammals can wait for better times to reproduce, or invest all of their energy in one offspring.

Short-lived animals like shrews are more vulnerable to short-term population changes.Canva

Does this mean that larger animals are safe from extinction?

This does not mean that larger animals are safe from extinction - or that smaller animals are inevitably doomed.

Smaller mammals with shorter lifespans can also ‘boom’ back more quickly, due to prolific rates of reproduction.

“These small mammals react quickly to extreme weather, and it goes both ways. Their vulnerability to extreme weather should therefore not be equated with a risk of extinction,” says report co-author John Jackson.

However, all animals - including large ones that are best able to withstand extreme weather - are also threatened by various other existential risks.

Habitat destruction, poaching, pollution and invasive species are factors that threaten many animal species - in many cases even more than climate change,” Jackson explains.

According to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, we lose around 150 species every single day.