ADVERTISEMENT

Federal court dismisses Trump campaign's Pennsylvania lawsuit

Federal court dismisses Trump campaign's Pennsylvania lawsuit
Copyright Patrick Semansky/Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Copyright Patrick Semansky/Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
By Daniel Bellamy with AP
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button
Copy/paste the article video embed link below:Copy to clipboardCopied

"Calling an election unfair does not make it so" the judges said as another attempt by Donald Trump's lawyers to challenge the Presidential election in court failed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Donald Trump's legal team suffered yet another defeat in court on Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected their latest effort to challenge the state's presidential election results.

The US president's lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judges' assessment that the `"campaign's claims have no merit."

"Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here," 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.

The case had been argued last week in a lower court by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who insisted during five hours of oral arguments that the 2020 presidential election had been marred by widespread fraud in Pennsylvania. However, Giuliani failed to offer any tangible proof of that in court.

US District Judge Matthew Brann, another Republican, had said the campaign's error-filled complaint, "like Frankenstein's Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together'' and denied Giuliani the right to amend it for a second time.

Despite the ruling, President Trump continued to allege fraud in a tweet late on Friday.

The 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals called any revisions "futile.'' Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith and Judge Michael Chagares were on the panel with Bibas, a former University of Pennsylvania law professor. Trump's sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, sat on the court for 20 years, retiring in 2019.

"Voters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,'' Bibas said in the opinion, which also denied the campaign's request to stop the state from certifying its results, a demand he called "breathtaking.''

In fact, Pennsylvania officials had announced Tuesday that they had certified their vote count for President-elect Joe Biden, who defeated Trump by more than 80,000 votes in the state.

Nationally, Biden and running mate Kamala Harris garnered nearly 80 million votes, a record in US presidential elections.

Trump has said he hopes the Supreme Court will intervene in the race, as it did in 2000 when its decision to stop the recount in Florida gave the election to Republican George W. Bush.

On Nov. 5, as the vote count continued, Trump posted a tweet saying the "U.S. Supreme Court should decide!''

Ever since, Trump and his surrogates have attacked the election as flawed and filed a flurry of lawsuits to try to block the results in six battleground states.

But they've found little sympathy from judges, nearly all of whom dismissed their complaints about the security of mail-in ballots, which millions of people used to vote from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Share this articleComments

You might also like

Biden calls for release of journalist at Correspondents' dinner

Mike Pence: Russian aggression poses 'serious threat' to Europe

Man dies after setting himself on fire outside Trump trial court