Nielsen's ouster underscores Trump's failures on the border

Image: Donald Trump
President Donald Trump tours the U.S. border with Mexico at the Rio Grande on Jan. 10, 2019, in McAllen, Texas, with Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, left, and Ted Cruz, R-Texas. Copyright Evan Vucci AP file
Copyright Evan Vucci AP file
By Chuck Todd and Mark Murray and Carrie Dann with NBC News Politics
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button

First Read is your briefing from "Meet the Press" and the NBC Political Unit on the day's most important political stories and why they matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON — Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen is out. But President Trump's failures on the border remain.

Trump announced that Kevin McAleenan, the current head of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, will become acting Homeland Security secretary.

The irony of Nielsen's ouster is that she had been "the most aggressive secretary in the department's short history in cracking down on immigration," Vox's Dara Lind writes. "None of it appears to have been enough for Trump."

Lind adds, "Nielsen couldn't make that happen, because no one could, because it's impossible. The U.S. can't — even with a wall — physically prevent the entry of unauthorized immigrants onto U.S. soil. And once on U.S. soil, they have certain rights — including the right to request asylum."

Our colleague, NBC's Dafna Linzer, makes another point about the massive Department of Homeland Security, which is responsible for much more than immigration and border enforcement: The organization is under serious strain.

Per Linzer: The deputy secretary, Elaine Duke, left one year ago, in April 2018. She was not replaced.

The head of ICE is acting, and his nomination to lead that DHS office was withdrawn, surprisingly, last week.

The head of FEMA, also under DHS, is "acting"

The inspector general resigned last year and that office is run by an "acting" head.

And more critically, McAleenan will now leave his post as commissioner of CPB — the largest federal law enforcement agency in the country and under DHS — to become "acting" DHS secretary.

Tweet of the day

Pete's Defeat (in 2010)

Maybe no other 2020 presidential candidate has enjoyed a better past month than South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

But as Dems look for a nominee who can beat Donald Trump, Buttigieg has to answer this question: How did he lose a statewide race (for Indiana treasurer) to Richard Mourdock by 25 points back in 2010?

Yes, that Richard Mourdock, who lost two years later in a Senate race to Democrat Joe Donnelly after saying that when a woman is impregnated during a rape, "it's something God intended."

On "Meet the Press" yesterday, one of us asked Buttigieg about that 25-point loss:

"It was 2010. It's hard for a Democrat to win statewide in the best of years. I was running in the worst of years. But I'm still proud of our campaign," he said.

There's no doubt that 2010 was a tough year for Democrats, especially in red states. But it's also worth noting that Buttigieg underperformed Dem Senate nominee Brad Ellsworth, who lost to Dan Coats (yes, that Dan Coats) by 15 points.

Of course, the Pete Buttigieg of 2010 isn't the Pete Buttigieg of 2019 (who just raised $7 million for the quarter); Mourdock was an incumbent in that '10 race, which is a hurdle for any challenger; and Donald Trump's election proved that almost anything is possible in our current politics.

But when it comes to electability — at least based on past results — Buttigieg has a more complicated answer to give than, say, Amy Klobuchar (who just won 60 percent in a state Trump almost carried in 2016), or Beto O'Rourke (whose 2.5-point loss in Texas could have been in many other states), or even Elizabeth Warren (who defeated Scott Brown in 2012).

ADVERTISEMENT

Sanders says he'll release his taxes "very, very shortly"

In an interview with NBC's Shaquille Brewster, 2020 Dem candidate Bernie Sanders said he'll be releasing his taxes shortly.

But we've also heard that one before.

BREWSTER: Taxes, you have filed for the past 10 years. Why not just release them today, (we will) why not just release them today, all of them?

SANDERS: They will be released very, very shortly. April 15th is coming, and we're gonna do our taxes for this year and that will be the 10th year --

Brewster: But 2016? 2017?

ADVERTISEMENT

SANDERS: We will-- They will all be there. You'll be happy to see them. I say when you talk about taxes, President Trump we're going to release ten years of our taxes, you (meaning Trump) do the same.

[snip]

BREWSTER: With you calling on the president to release his taxes, why not just do it now-- release what you have so far?

SANDERS: We are. Not right this minute.

Brewster: Not today?

ADVERTISEMENT

SANDERS: We are, not right this minute, you think I have them in my back pocket?

For the record, in the 2016 cycle, Sanders released just one tax return — a summary for 2014. That's it.

2020 Vision: Booker raised $5 million-plus

On Sunday, Cory Booker's campaign announced raising more than $5 million for the first fundraising quarter (Jan. 1 to March 31), and that it has more than $6.1 million in the bank - due to Senate money transferred to his presidential account.

To put Booker's haul into perspective with the other 2020 candidates who have announced their first-quarter totals so far:

Total raised

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bernie Sanders: $18.2 million in 41 days
  • Kamala Harris: $12 million in 70 days
  • Beto O'Rourke: $9.4 million in 18 days
  • Pete Buttigieg: $7 million in 68 days
  • Cory Booker: $5 million-plus in 59 days

Total raised (average per day)

  • Beto: $552K
  • Bernie: $444K'
  • Harris: $171K
  • Pete: $103K
  • Booker: $85K

The candidates have until April 15 to file their first-quarter reports to the Federal Election Commission.

On the campaign trail today

The 2020 Democrats head out west today: Amy Klobuchar and Bernie Sanders speak at a transportation conference in Las Vegas… And Pete Buttigieg also holds two events in Vegas.

Data Download: The number of the day is … 17 percent.

Seventeen percent.

That's the share of Americans who say they think their taxes will go DOWN as a result of Trump-passed tax reform legislation, according to new numbers released from our NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

ADVERTISEMENT

More Americans think their taxes will go up (28 percent) or stay the same (27 percent.)

Those most likely to think their taxes will go down?

That would be Republicans (33 percent) and higher-income earners (25 percent).

The Lid: Twitter killed the political star

Don't miss the pod from Friday, when one of us looked at how social media has changed American politics since 2008.

ICYMI: News clips you shouldn't miss

Mick Mulvaney says that Democrats will "never" see Trump's tax returns.

ADVERTISEMENT

What exactly is with Andrew Yang's universal basic income plan?

Over the weekend, Pete Buttigieg gave an emotional speech about coming out.

POLITICO looks at how Stephen Miller is driving the immigration shakeup.

And RIP Fritz Hollings.

Other news that's out there…

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump agenda: I'm all about that base

NBC's Jonathan Allen takes an in-depth look at Trump's base-only 2020 strategy.

Trump is looming large over the Israeli elections.

Thousands of families remain separated as a result of the Trump travel ban.

Trump's 2020 campaign messaging is shaping up to look a lot like his 2016 one.

Dem agenda: War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing…

The New York Times takes a look at the warring between the DCCC and the progressive wing of the Democratic Party.

ADVERTISEMENT

The death penalty may be the next frontier for Democratic reformers.

2020: Don't you (forget about me)

"The Breakfast Club" is becoming a must-stop destination for 2020 candidates.

Bernie Sanders and Beto O'Rourke are recalibrating their strategies after criticism.

O'Rourke's campaign is strong, but it's not quite like his Senate race.

Elizabeth Warren is hoping that sweeping policy plans win over voters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nielsen's ouster underscores Trump's failures on the border

Share this articleComments