'Simply false': Obama aides reject Trump wiretap claims

'Simply false': Obama aides reject Trump wiretap claims
By Alasdair Sandford
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button
Copy/paste the article video embed link below:Copy to clipboardCopied

A spokesman and a former adviser to the ex-president have dismissed Donald Trump's unsubstantiated claims that Obama had him wiretapped.


Close aides to Barack Obama have dismissed accusations by Donald Trump that the then-president tapped his soon-to-be successor’s phone during the late stages of the election campaign.

The unsubstantiated claims made in a series of presidential tweets are being seen as an attempt to divert attention from questions over the Trump team’s ties to Russia.

‘Unequivocally false’

Former Obama adviser Ben Rhodes, in his own series of tweets, said no president could order a wiretap and called on the White House to explain “these repeated blatant lies”.

No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you.

— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) March 4, 2017

Neither barackobama</a> nor any WH official under Obama has ever ordered surveillance on any US Citizen. Any suggestion is unequivocally false <a href=""></a></p>— Kevin Lewis (KLewis44) March 4, 2017

Barack Obama’s spokesman Kevin Lewis also rejected the claim out of hand, saying the former administration had a cardinal rule not to interfere with any Justice Department investigation, and no-one in Obama’s team ordered any surveillance. “Any suggestion otherwise is unequivocally false,” he tweeted.

What is Trump’s evidence?

The White House has offered no evidence for Trump’s early morning Twitter tirade, despite being pestered all day to come up with some. Critics have suggested the ball is in the president’s court to substantiate his claims. NBC News quoted an unnamed senior US official as saying that Trump failed to consult others in the government beforehand, and that the claims are baseless.

The president said he had “just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory”. Calling his predecessor a “bad (or sick) guy”, he labelled it “McCarthyism” and “Nixon/Watergate” – a reference to major US political scandals in the second half of the 20th century.

It’s thought that Trump may have been inspired by right-wing media reports claiming that Obama’s team obtained authorisation to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign.

One commentator has suggested that Obama’s “police state“actions should be investigated, rather than the Trump campaign’s Russian ties. A series of apparently unconnected events are linked to create a supposition that the former president had conducted a “silent coup”.

A diversion from Russia?

The timing of Donald Trump’s latest outburst has led Democrats to accuse him of trying to divert attention from his administration’s difficulties over Russia.

The Deflector-in-Chief is at it again. An investigation by an independent commission is the only answer.

— Nancy Pelosi (@NancyPelosi) March 4, 2017

One senior figure – former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn – resigned, while another – Attorney General Jeff Sessions – is under scrutiny, over what they said about meetings with the Russian ambassador.

Intelligence accusations of Russian interference in the election have also embarrassed the Trump team.

The episode has revived long-standing hostility between Trump and Obama and has renewed criticism of the president’s style, after a week in which his speech to Congress had been positively received.

On Saturday supporters of the president held “Spirit of America” rallies in more than half of the country’s 50 states.

Analysis: Trump was a conspiracy-theory candidate. Now he’s on the verge of being a conspiracy-theory president.

— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) March 4, 2017

Share this articleComments

You might also like

Clashes in California as pro and anti-Trump protesters rally across US

Trump accuses Obama of "wire tapping" in flurry of early morning Tweets

Looking for an online article from 2013? It may have disappeared, new study says