Saving the whale - IWC meets in Slovenia

Saving the whale - IWC meets in Slovenia
Copyright 
By Catherine Hardy with IWC, Reuters
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button
Copy/paste the article video embed link below:Copy to clipboardCopied

Dispute between Australia and Japan is likely to feature near the top of the agenda at the organisation's biennial congress

What is happening?

ADVERTISEMENT

More than 80 nations have gathered in Slovenia for the biennial meeting of the International Whaling Commission.

The IWC tries to balance national sovereignty, culture and subsistence rights with nature conservation and animal cruelty concerns.

Originally established as an international body for regulating sustainable whaling and monitoring whale stocks, the IWC started leaning towards conservation and nature protection in the 1970s and 1980s.

The meeting will run for five days and marks the 70th anniversary of the IWC’s founding.

It also coincides with the 30th anniversary of the whaling moratorium, which is estimated to have saved tens of thousands of whales.

Great intervention by India at #IWC66, all cetacean species in India have highest level of protection, fully support sanctuaries! pic.twitter.com/Jef244tVjV

— Humane Society Int'l (@HSIGlobal) October 24, 2016

What is likely to be top of the agenda?

  • Japan’s return to whale hunting
  • Plans for a whale sanctuary

Among the main issues discussed will be Australia’s renewed efforts to bring more scrutiny to the process of scientific whaling permits. These are issued by Japan to Japanese whalers in defiance of the moratorium.

Additionally, Brazil and several other South American and African countries are pushing for the establishment of a new whale sanctuary in the Atlantic.

Will the meeting go smoothly?

Unlikely.

The organisation’s 88 member nations are divided into pro- and anti-whaling camps.

Who are the main pro-whaling nations?

  • Japan
  • Iceland
  • Norway

Japan sets its own quotas for whale hunts it says are carried out for “scientific purposes”.

Norway and Iceland hunt carry out commercial whale hunting under legal loopholes.

Aboriginal whaling

  • Canada
  • Russia
  • Faroe Islands (Denmark)

Aboriginal whaling is carried out by countries with a tradition of doing it for subsistence purposes.

Japan

Although a 1986 moratorium was successful in greatly reducing the numbers of whales taken, Japan chose to defy the ban.

It routinely exploits a provision in the moratorium that allows whaling to be conducted for scientific purposes.

Because of this, Japanese whalers still kill hundreds of whales every year.

Many are in the southern ocean, which led Australia to take Japan to the International Court of Justice.

It ruled in 2014 that Japan’s whaling should cease.

ADVERTISEMENT

In spite of the ruling, Japan continued with its whaling programme. This led Australia to propose a more stringent review of all existing permits.

Anti-whaling NGOs say Japan’s scientific whaling is a disguise. Others criticise the practice because it is carried out in the southern ocean. This has been declared a whale sanctuary and all whaling is prohibited.

Japan to face criticism at IWC for ignoring whaling ruling, comments by HSI's Kitty Block HSIGlobal</a> <a href="https://t.co/QzW1eG0wH2">https://t.co/QzW1eG0wH2</a></p>&mdash; HSI Australia (hsi_australia) October 20, 2016

A whale sanctuary at sea

A new sanctuary, proposed jointly by the governments of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and South Africa, would turn the entire Atlantic Ocean between South America and Africa into a whale haven.

It has been described as a much-needed tool to fight the new dangers that whales and dolphins face.

HSI is hugely supportive of the creation of a South Atlantic Whale Sanctuary. #SAWS will be discussed & voted at #IWC next week HSIGlobal</a> <a href="https://t.co/U4tGtI4zZ5">pic.twitter.com/U4tGtI4zZ5</a></p>&mdash; HSI Australia (hsi_australia) October 21, 2016

Strong arguments at #IWC66 from proponents of South Atlantic Whale Sanctuary resolution, this must be supported!

— IFAW UK Press (@IFAWUKPress) October 24, 2016

How many whales die each year?

Experts think around 2,000.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, hundreds of thousands more – possibly up to 300,000 – die as “bycatch”, accidentally caught in fishing nets.

Bycatch has been reduced for turtles, dolphins and albatrosses – why not for whales? #IWC66#IWC2016https://t.co/6OrjW7MGLupic.twitter.com/i94VSPGrV4

— Mark Gately (@GatelyMark) October 24, 2016

What they are saying

“Whaling has no place in the 21st century. It is outdated, it is thoroughly inhumane,” – Claire Bass, Humane Society International.

“Science is needed whenever we conduct hunting or fishery or whatever. The utilization of natural resources needs to be supported by scientific evidence. The form of scientific research might be different, but science is still needed,” – Japan’s Commissioner Joji Morishita.

“Australia, as you know, has invested significant amounts of money and helped an initiative known as the Twelve Nation Southern Ocean Research Partnership which emphasizes non-lethal methods of research. Acoustic tagging, underwater listening stations and satellite tracking can all provide very successful, effective and efficient methods of research without using lethal methods,” – Josh Frydenberg, Australian Minister for Environment and Energy.

Share this articleComments

You might also like

French forces seek to retake control of key New Caledonia highway amid unrest

Activists disrupt Google conference to protest against ties to Israel

Pro-Palestinian protests continue in Belgium and the Netherlands