Newsletter Newsletters Events Events Podcasts Videos Africanews
Loader
Advertisement

As solar and wind boom to record levels, are we ignoring the power of geothermal energy?

EnergySource’s First Geothermal Plant in Imperial Valley.
EnergySource’s First Geothermal Plant in Imperial Valley. Copyright  Copyright Business Wire 2012.
Copyright Copyright Business Wire 2012.
By Liam Gilliver
Published on
Share Comments
Share Close Button

Geothermal systems that harness heat from deep underground require significantly less land infrastructure than other renewable energies.

New technologies originally designed to extract oil and gas from deep underground could help “open the doors” to a fossil fuel-free future thanks to enhanced geothermal systems (EGS).

A new study from Stanford University, published in Cell Reports Sustainability, found that EGS can “significantly reduce” the amount of wind, solar, and battery infrastructure needed for a clean energy transition while keeping electricity prices competitive.

“ESG is a promising clean, renewable technology that works together with wind, solar, hydro and batteries to help power the world for all purposes,” says lead-author of the study Mark Jacobson. “[This] provides energy security while eliminating energy-related air pollution and global warming at low costs.”

How do enhanced geothermal systems work?

Unlike conventional geothermal plants that are limited to volcanic and tectonic-plate-boundary regions (such as Iceland), EGS involves drilling up to eight kilometres deep, injecting fluid into cracked rocks, then pumping the heated fluid back up to generate electricity.

Researchers compared scenarios with and without EGS and found that adding EGS to the renewable energy mix produces "substantial infrastructure savings”.

When EGS provided just 10 per cent of electricity supply, onshore wind capacity needs decreased by 15 per cent, solar capacity dropped by 12 per cent, and battery storage requirements plummeted by 28 per cent.

Total land requirements also fell from 0.57 per cent to 0.48 per cent of the countries’ combined land area. Researchers say this could be appealing for small or densely populated nations such as Taiwan and South Korea.

The study also found that clean, renewable energy dramatically reduces costs whether or not EGS is included. Both scenarios slashed annual energy costs by around 60 per cent compared with “business-as-usual fossil fuel use”.

“When health and climate costs, such as air pollution-related illnesses and sea level rise, are factored in, total social costs plummet by approximately 90 per cent,” the study says.

Because EGS provides constant electricity, experts argue it could be useful for providing electricity to off-grid data centres, which are booming in popularity across the world due to artificial intelligence (AI).

Will EGS become cheaper?

Costs have long been a barrier to the expansion of EGS, but experts predict that they could drop significantly by 2035.

Jacobson attributes this to improvements in drilling speeds, adding: “These speeds allow EGS projects to be completed quickly, unlike nuclear, which requires planting-to-operation times of 12 to 23 years worldwide.

“Also, unlike nuclear, EGS has no risk of weapons proliferation, meltdown, radioactive waste storage leaks, or underground uranium mining.”

Go to accessibility shortcuts
Share Comments

Read more