Meta, formerly known as Facebook, was unable to derail a second attempt by the FTC to bring an antitrust case against the company.
A federal judge has ruled that the revised antitrust suit pursued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) against Meta, formerly known as Facebook, can proceed, shutting down the social media company’s request for a dismissal.
In a revised complaint filed last August, the FTC argues that the company pursued a "buy or bury" strategy against rivals to suppress competition.
This is the FTC’s second antitrust legal challenge against the company.
In June last year, a federal judge dismissed antitrust lawsuits brought against Facebook by the agency and a broad coalition of state attorneys general that were among multiplying efforts by federal and state regulators to rein in Big Tech's market power.
The FTC is seeking remedies that could include a forced spinoff of Facebook’s popular Instagram and WhatsApp messaging services, or a restructuring of the company.
Facts in new suit are 'far more robust'
US District Judge James Boasberg, who in June ruled that the FTC’s original lawsuit was "legally insufficient" and didn’t provide enough evidence to prove that Facebook was a monopoly, said in Tuesday's ruling that the first complaint "stumbled out of the starting blocks".
But he added that, though the "core theory" of the lawsuit — that Facebook is a monopoly engaging in anticompetitive behavior — remains unchanged, the facts alleged this time around are "far more robust and detailed than before".
Meta said in an emailed statement it is "confident the evidence will reveal the fundamental weakness of the claims".
"Our investments in Instagram and WhatsApp transformed them into what they are today," the company said.
"They have been good for competition, and good for the people and businesses that choose to use our products".
Holly Vedova, director of the FTC's bureau of competition, said the agency presented a "strong amended complaint a strong amended complaint, and we look forward to trial".