Find Us

Voting system vendors reveal owners after Russian hacks and investments

Image: A man votes in Durham, North Carolina
A man votes on November 8, 2016 in Durham, North Carolina. African American turn out to the polls was reporting low across the battleground state. Copyright Sara D. Davis Getty Images file
Copyright Sara D. Davis Getty Images file
By Ben Popken with NBC News Tech and Science News
Published on
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button

Election officials are scrutinizing top voting system vendors for potential foreign ownership after Russian hacks and investments.


Election officials in North Carolina and Maryland are scrutinizing top voting system vendors for potential foreign ownership, demanding more transparency after revelations of Russian penetration into 2016 election systems and a Russian oligarch's majority investment in an election data firm used by Maryland.

In April, the report by special counsel Robert Mueller revealed that Russian-backed hackers inserted malware into a company's system for voting registration in Florida during the last presidential election as part of the Kremlin-backed disruption campaign. The company name was redacted but executives for VR systems have said it was probably them, the AP reported. VR Systems disputed it was hacked.

VR systems was also the vendor in Durham County, North Carolina, which experienced Election Day glitches and slowdowns. The federal Department of Homeland Security announced in early June it will audit the laptops used that day, the government's first forensic audit of equipment that malfunctioned during the election.

The possibility of foreign involvement in U.S. voting technology became more vivid after last year Maryland officials learned its election data host, ByteGrid LLC, was owned in the majority by a private equity firm in which Vladimir Potanin, a Russian oligarch with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, had an investment. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) later found no sign of intrusion into the state election system.

Facing national scrutiny and a legally-mandated deadline of Dec. 1 to decertify its current paperless voting machines, which security experts say could be more vulnerable to an electronic attack and lack an auditable paper trail, the North Carolina State Board of Elections earlier this month set a Friday noon deadline for the nation's top voting system vendors vying for the bid to disclose more details about their private ownership structure.

The three companies responded to the requests, the board told NBC News, but their initial answers appeared to have failed to meet the state's appetite for additional details about who may be behind the companies making American voting systems.

"The State Board legal team is communicating with the companies to clarify responses and seek additional information as necessary," Patrick Gannon, public information officer for the North Carolina State Board of Elections, told NBC News.

In mid-June the state requested the vendors, Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic Inc., and Clear Ballot, disclose "any owners or shareholders with a 5 percent or greater interest or share in the company, any subsidiary companies and the vendor's parent company."

In response to NBC News inquiries, each equipment maker said they were owned by U.S.-based companies or individuals.

"ES&S is owned by Americans and has zero foreign ownership," Katina Granger, spokesperson for the McCarthy Group, LLC subsidiary, both Omaha-based, wrote NBC News in an email.

"Since 2011, Hart has been owned by HIG Capital... [b]ased in Miami," wrote Steven C. Sockwell, vice president of marketing for the Austin-based firm, in an email.

Clear Ballot has "no other parent companies or subsidiaries" the Boston-based company emailed the State, according to a copy reviewed by NBC News.

The email listed four shareholders with a five percent or greater stake in Clear Ballot. They were Larry Moore, founder and a former Lotus executive, Tim Halvorsen, an early Lotus developer and board member of various startups, Steven Pappa, partner at private venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, and Raging Capital Opportunity Fund V, LLC, a Princeton-based hedge fund.

"A critical part of preserving voter confidence in U.S. elections is providing transparency and assurance that vendors of election technology are not influenced by any foreign interest," said Eddie Perez, global director of technology development for the Open Source Election Technology Institute (OSET), a nonprofit that conducts election technology research, and NBC News elections analyst. "It's a matter of national security."

Share this articleComments

You might also like

Apple launches faster chips, MacBook Pro laptops and cheaper Airpods - what are the upgrades?

What is the metaverse and why is Facebook betting big on it?

Euronews Debates | Profit vs public good: How can innovation benefit everyone?