Newsletter Newsletters Events Events Podcasts Videos Africanews
Loader
Advertisement

Japan's Murakami withdraws from consideration for alternative Nobel award

Japan's Murakami withdraws from consideration for alternative Nobel award
FILE PHOTO: Japanese writer Haruki Murakami, laureate of Hans Christian Andersen Literature Award 2016, is seen outside H. C. Andersen's house in Odense, Denmark October 30, 2016. Scanpix Denmark/Henning Bagger/via REUTERS/File Photo Copyright  Ritzau Scanpix Denmark(Reuters)
Copyright Ritzau Scanpix Denmark(Reuters)
By Reuters
Published on
Share this article Comments
Share this article Close Button

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese author Haruki Murakami has asked for the withdrawal of his nomination for an alternative to the Nobel Prize in Literature, postponed this year over a sexual misconduct scandal, saying he wanted to concentrate on his writing.

One of Japan's most successful literary exports, Murakami's Nobel prospects are the subject of intense annual scrutiny in his home country.

Murakami expressed gratitude at the nomination, but said he wanted to "concentrate on writing, away from media attention", the organisers of the New Academy Prize in Literature said while announcing his withdrawal on social media site Facebook.

It gave no further details of Murakami's decision.

The replacement award was set up by a group of Swedish cultural figures after this year's Nobel Prize in Literature was postponed following a sexual misconduct scandal at the Swedish Academy. [nL8N1SB1Z6]

The other nominees for the alternative prize are British-born author Neil Gaiman, Guadeloupe-born Maryse Conde and Vietnam-born Kim Thuy.

They have all "expressed enthusiasm for their nomination," the organisers' statement added. The winner will be announced in October.

(Reporting by Sam Nussey; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)

Go to accessibility shortcuts
Share this article Comments

Read more

Uzbekistan’s Olympic leap: celebrating Independence Day with new sporting heights

ChatGPT may be shifting ‘rightward’ in political bias, study finds

UNICEF 2025: How leaders can unite in support of future generations