EventsEventsPodcasts
Loader
Find Us
ADVERTISEMENT

TV report claims H&M burns unsold clothes

TV report claims H&M burns unsold clothes
Copyright 
By Robert Hackwill
Published on
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button
Copy/paste the article video embed link below:Copy to clipboardCopied

The environment is the biggest fashion victim of them all says TV report claiming big retailers burn unsold clothes

ADVERTISEMENT

Swedish high street clothes retailer H&M is fond of promoting an environmentally conscious image, but a Danish TV investigation claims it and Danish clothes company Bestseller’s unsold togs end up making a journey in tipper trucks, secretly filmed, to a giant incinerator in Roskilde.

The unsold clothes go up in smoke because, says H&M, they have been damaged in transportation by humidity, for example, or have too-high chemical levels. Campaigners dispute this, and say the company’s policies are hypocritical, and unsustainable.

“The production of one pair of jeans requires 3.625 liters of water, 400 mJ of energy, 3 kg of chemicals. And if we incinerate jeans then it makes a mockery of global sustainability,” says the CEO of Redress, Christina Dean.

The concept of a circular economy is the same idea of Mother Nature. Christina Dean is the circular economy master! https://t.co/gvVs5qMzw5pic.twitter.com/sRWMuauFrD

— Redress (@Redress_Asia) 18 octobre 2017

The investigation claims H&M has incinerated 60 tons of clothes since 2013. Intercepted company mails from H&M and Bestseller confirm water damage is an issue, but the journalists selected two pairs at random
from the discards and found nothing wrong. The mails justified the clothes’ destruction on “health and safety” issues. H&M had the garments independently tested, and discovered mould and lead contamination, publishing the results. Bestseller burned 49.2 tons of clothes, jewelry and shoes last year.

Do brands incinerate deadstock? Christina Dean of Redress_Asia</a> investigates in our fanzine: <a href="https://t.co/m2MCF537ru">https://t.co/m2MCF537ru</a> Photo by <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamFarr11?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">williamfarr11

— FashionRevolution (@Fash_Rev) 17 octobre 2017

H&M has been criticised in the past for its opaque communications, and when challenged by one of the TV team about the health risks involved, he got this reply.

“Do you have documentation of it being hazardous to health?”
“ We can document it to those who need that, said H&M’s Head of Communications Stine Olio.
“And that’s not me?”
“No.”

Share this articleComments

You might also like

Fully electric, well-funded and flexible: how Europe’s energy system could look by 2030

Is Europe's Green Deal entering a grey zone?

Golden silk and ancient weaving craft showcased in Qatar