Newsletter Newsletters Events Events Podcasts Videos Africanews
Loader
Advertisement

Germany designates AfD as right-wing extremist organisation, citing threat to democracy

Leader of the AfD parliamentary group Alice Weidel, left, and AfD federal chairman and leader of the AfD parliamentary group Tino Chrupalla, 23 April 2024.
Leader of the AfD parliamentary group Alice Weidel, left, and AfD federal chairman and leader of the AfD parliamentary group Tino Chrupalla, 23 April 2024. Copyright  AP
Copyright AP
By Estelle Nilsson-Julien & Aleksandar Brezar
Published on Updated
Share this article Comments
Share this article Close Button
Copy/paste the article video embed link below: Copy to clipboard Copied

Germany’s Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution has designated AfD as a right-wing extremist organisation, citing xenophobic stances as the reason.

ADVERTISEMENT

Germany’s Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution on Friday designated the far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD) as a right-wing extremist organisation that poses a threat to democracy and the constitutional order.

The office, also known as BfV, cited the AfD’s xenophobic stances on ethnicity as the reason for the decision, stating the party was being discriminatory towards non-ethnic Germans.

According to the statement released on Friday, the office's experts have examined whether the AfD's actions “matched central basic principles of the German constitution" over a three-year period.

The office also looked into statements shared by AfD representatives, their broader behaviour, as well as their connections to right-wing extremist actors and groups.

This led the body to determine that the AfD “aims to exclude certain population groups from equal participation in society, to subject them to unconstitutional unequal treatment and thus to assign them a legally devalued status."

It added that the far-right party does not consider people with “a migration history from Muslim-influenced countries as equivalent members of the ethnically defined German people.”

Meanwhile, the AfD's co-chairs Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla issued a joint statement in which they claimed the decision was "politically motivated", reminding their supporters that the classification has not yet been "legally finalised."

Weidel and Chrupalla stated that the party would continue to "legally defend" itself, against what it said was "defamation".

In turn, Germany's Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said in a statement that the classification was “clear and unambiguous” and resulted from a 1,100-page “comprehensive and neutral audit” without political influence.

In Germany's February elections, the AfD came in second with 20.8% of the vote, after the centre-right CDU and ahead of the centre-left SPD, the two parties that will form the new government.

The same decision was already in place for some sections of the party, including its youth wing.

However, the designation does not amount to a ban of the party, which can only take place through a request by either of parliament's two chambers or the federal government through the Federal Constitutional Court.

Although the German parliament could ask for the entire party to be dissolved, it is very unlikely that this will actually happen.

Outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz has since called for caution regarding a possible ban on the AfD, stating, "I am against a kneejerk. We have to evaluate the classification carefully."

Go to accessibility shortcuts
Share this article Comments

Read more

AfD's failure to appeal 'extremist' classification in Saxony raises questions over national ban

Why the European Union won't hit China with the 100% tariffs that Trump wants

EU Commission sued for secrecy over ditched food label plan