BREAKING NEWS
This content is not available in your region

Michael Flynn's move to withdraw guilty plea could backfire, experts say

Comments
Image: Michael FLynn
Gen. Michael Flynn, former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, leaves Federal Court in Washington on Dec. 1, 2017.   -  
Copyright
Brendan Smialowski AFP - Getty Images file
Text size Aa Aa

At a sentencing hearing in late 2018, a federal judge delivered a harsh rebuke of Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump's first national security adviser, who had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI.

"I can't make any guarantees, but I'm not hiding my disgust, my disdain for this criminal offense," Judge Emmet Sullivan said.

At the time, Flynn opted to postpone his sentencing, ostensibly to offer more assistance to the government and stave off a prison term. But now, more than a year later, he has a new defense team and a radical new strategy: to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that he's a victim of an overzealous Justice Department operating in "bad faith."

The move, experts say, amounts to a Hail Mary that has the potential to place Flynn in greater legal peril.

"This is a risky maneuver," said Jeffrey Harris, a former federal prosecutor in New York and deputy associate attorney general in the Justice Department during the Reagan administration.

"If judge Sullivan were to allow him to do it — and I don't think he will — and he loses (at trial), he's toast," Harris said.

But Harris said that if Sullivan rejects the motion to withdraw the plea, Flynn's highly combative approach could end up landing him a harsher sentence than he might have otherwise received.

"He shouldn't take this into account, but judges are human," Harris added.

Michael Flynn leaves federal court after he pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI in Washington on Dec. 1. Flynn became the first Trump White House official to face criminal charges and admit guilt so far in the wide-ranging election investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller.
Michael Flynn leaves federal court after he pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI in Washington on Dec. 1. Flynn became the first Trump White House official to face criminal charges and admit guilt so far in the wide-ranging election investigation led by special counsel Robert Mueller.Chip Somodevilla

Other legal experts said the move could be a ploy by Flynn to stay in the good graces of Trump and increase Flynn's chances of securing a presidential pardon.

"Attacking the Justice Department's investigation is consistent with the president's position," said Renato Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor in Illinois. "It certainly makes it more likely that he could obtain a pardon."

Flynn's case stretches back more than two years. He pleaded guilty in December 2017 to a charge of lying to the FBI about his conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the weeks before Trump took office.

The allegations surfaced months earlier, prompting Flynn to resign his post as national security adviser after 24 days, the shortest tenure in the office's history.

Flynn, a retired three-star Army general, agreed to cooperate in special counsel Robert Mueller's probe. He participated in 19 interviews with federal investigators and provided several documents, according to court papers.

Mueller's team later lauded Flynn for providing "substantial assistance" in the investigation into Russian election interference in 2016. They recommended a sentence of little to no jail time.

But then came the sentencing hearing in December 2018. Judge Sullivan admonished Flynn for working as an unregistered foreign agent for the Turkish government during the campaign. Flynn registered as a foreign agent only after he left his White House post, but he was not charged with a crime.

Sullivan also scolded Flynn for lying to the FBI.

"This is a very serious offense," Sullivan said. "A high-ranking senior official of the government making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation while on the physical premises of the White House."

The dramatic hearing ended with Flynn taking up the judge on his offer to provide more time to offer further assistance to the government.

But Flynn took a different approach instead. He dumped his veteran Washington attorneys and replaced them with a legal team led by Sidney Powell, a Fox News regular and prominent critic of Mueller's investigation.

Flynn's new defense team immediately went on the attack and pushed for the case to be thrown out, accusing the government of targeting Flynn for political purposes and coercing him into making false statements.

"High-ranking FBI officials orchestrated an ambush-interview of the new president's National Security Advisor, not for the purpose of discovering any evidence of criminal activity — they already had tapes of all the relevant conversations about which they questioned Mr. Flynn — but for the purpose of trapping him into making statements they could allege as false," his lawyers said in court papers last year.

Prosecutors flatly rejected the allegations and accused Flynn of pushing conspiracy theories. The judge sided with the prosecutors. Then the Justice Department reversed its position and recommended a prison sentence of up to six months, citing Flynn's failure to live up to his promise to cooperate with prosecutors.

Late Tuesday, Flynn filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea that recycles many of his previous allegations.

"The prosecution has shown abject bad faith in pure retaliation against Mr. Flynn since he retained new counsel," it says. "This can only be because with new, unconflicted counsel, Mr. Flynn refused to lie for the prosecution."

The judge could call a hearing on the matter before deciding whether or not to grant the motion. Three former federal prosecutors interviewed by NBC News said they predict Sullivan will reject it, setting up another sentencing hearing for Flynn.

"Defendants often try to withdraw their pleas but in my experience, judges rarely grant them," Mariotti said. "If a defendant could just change their mind, it would just upset the whole process."

In an email, Powell rejected the views of the outside legal experts.

"They don't know what I know about the conduct of the government in this case," she said. "You might want to read the exhibits, but they are only the tip of the iceberg. Stay tuned for more."

The experts said Flynn's move is risky for another reason: if the judge were to grant his motion, prosecutors could potentially file a superseding indictment with additional charges.

"From any conventional analysis," Mariotti added, "this doesn't make sense because he had a pretty good deal and he was going to have a recommendation for a sentence of almost nothing. He's potentially hurting himself."

Euronews is no longer accessible on Internet Explorer. This browser is not updated by Microsoft and does not support the last technical evolutions. We encourage you to use another browser, such as Edge, Safari, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.