The North Korea summit crumbled after China lined up against it

Image: Xi Jinping
Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Oct. 24, 2017. Copyright Wu Hong EPA file
Copyright Wu Hong EPA file
By Andrea Mitchell with NBC News Politics
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button

President Xi became increasingly anxious about the potential reunification of the Korean Peninsula, with China on the sidelines.


News analysis

Why did Kim Jong Un recently harden his demands for the summit and stop working on plans for the Singapore meeting with White House and State Department officials? The answer, according to senior administration officials and outside experts, is China.

President Donald Trump hinted today that he had an idea why the North Korea summit went off track, telling reporters "the dialogue was good until recently, and I think I understand why that happened." He went on to joke that reporters could write about it in a book.

But foreign policy analysts aren't waiting for a book to suggest that Beijing was the hidden hand behind the summit's derailment, as President Xi Jinping became increasingly anxious about the potential reunification of the Korean Peninsula — with China on the sidelines.

Trump himself suggested his suspicions two days ago when he was asked about China during an Oval Office meeting with South Korea's President Moon Jae In.

Trump answered: "I will say I'm a little disappointed because when Kim Jong Un had the meeting with President Xi in China, the second meeting... I think there was a little change in attitude from Kim Jong Un. So I don't like that." He added: "I think things changed after that meeting, so I can't say that I'm happy about it."

And, in fact, there was a noticeable change in Pyongyang's public statements and private actions after Kim's second visit to China in two months on May 8, after not having visited China in six years.

Why is China so concerned? Retired U.S. Navy Adm. James Stavridis, a former supreme allied commander of NATO and currently the dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, said today that "you could feel the air collapse in the summit ballon" after Kim's appearance in Beijing.

"Clearly China wants to position themselves to be a driver in this process," he said in an interview. "They encouraged Kim Jong Un to step back from the summit."

Stavridis added: "The way this summit was moving, we were going to end up with a U.S./North Korea summit, South Korea playing a bit part and China not even on the stage. That is unacceptable to President Xi."

In recent days, Beijing has also provoked the U.S. by landing one of its bombers on a Chinese man-made island in the South China Sea, which is disputed territory. In retaliation, the Pentagon "disinvited" China Wednesday from participating in biennial military exercises in the region.

China's Councilor Wang Yi, the country's top diplomat, called that decision "negative" and "non-constructive" at a State Department news conference with Secretary of State Pompeo yesterday. He said it was "unhelpful to mutual understanding between China and the U.S."

Now, on top of escalating military tension and trade wars with China, the administration will also blame China for scuttling the president's hopes for an historic agreement with North Korea.

By most accounts, the White House expectations were unrealistic and set too high. But the diplomatic fallout carries big risks. Many experts see South Korea's Moon as the big loser, having received no warning from Trump that he was cancelling the summit today.

The South Korean leader, elected on a platform of North-South reconciliation, was heavily invested in the summit succeeding, even putting his reputation on the line by taking Kim Jong Un by the hand to jointly step across the Demilitarized Zone.

Trump is also a potential loser, as critics claim he was too eager to accept Kim's invitation for a meeting before he had even been briefed on the details of the offer.

The real concern now is unintended consequences, like a return to the bellicose threats between Kim and Trump that seemed to reach a crescendo with "fire and fury" and the New Year's recriminations about the size of each other's nuclear "buttons."

Said Admiral Stavridis: "We should all be very concerned about the increasing possibility of a full-on war on the Korean Peninsula. That has re-emerged as a very serious possibility."

Share this articleComments

You might also like

Trump's North Korea withdrawal was erratic, bombastic and totally predictable | View