New theory in the never-ending search for the Loch Ness monster: a really big eel

Image: Tourists take in Urquhart Castle on the banks of Loch Ness in the Sc
Tourists take in Urquhart Castle on the banks of Loch Ness in the Scottish Highlands, Scotland. Copyright Andy Buchanan
Copyright Andy Buchanan
By Yuliya Talmazan with NBC News World News
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button

While the legend of the Loch Ness monster goes back hundreds of years, the first modern sighting of Nessie was reported in 1933.

ADVERTISEMENT

LONDON — The Loch Ness monster is no monster, but if it is any consolation it may be a big eel.

On Thursday, an international group of scientists that compiled the genetic profiles of living creatures in Scotland's mysterious Loch Ness said they had found no evidence that the fabled eponymous creature was lurking in the lake.

"We have no definitive evidence of a monster," said Professor Neil Gemmell of the University of Otago, New Zealand, who led the study.

The Loch Ness monster, or Nessie for short, is one of Scotland's most enduring tales. Alleged sightings have given birth to stories of a prehistoric creature living in the loch.

But the team of researchers led by Gemmell analyzed the environmental DNA — or genetic material shed by all life in Loch Ness — from around 250 samples of water collected from the lake last year, and compared it to large databases of genetic sequences from known species.

The scientists did not find evidence of DNA sequences similar to those predicted to come from a large extinct marine reptile.

A shadowy shape that some people believe is a photo of the Loch Ness monster from April 19 1934.
A shadowy shape that some people believe is a photo of the Loch Ness monster from April 19 1934.Keystone

Speaking in Drumnadrochit on the western shore of Loch Ness, Gemmell told reporters the scientists found no reptilian DNA sequences, which makes him fairly certain that there is no "giant scaly reptile" swimming in the loch.

Scientists also explored the possibility of giant fish, such as catfish or sturgeon, being responsible for sightings, but Gemmel said that was a dead end too.

But the team did find a surprisingly large amount of eel DNA in the loch, he said.

Gemmell said eel can grow 4 to 6 feet in length, but reported Loch Ness sightings usually involve a much bigger creature. There is no way to tell how big these eels are from DNA evidence, he said.

"Is it a giant eel? I don't know, but it is something that we can test further," he said.

Gemmel did dangle the tantalizing possibility that the team had missed something.

"There well may be a monster in Loch Ness, but we didn't find it," he said.

The waters of Loch Ness in Scotland, United Kingdom.
The waters of Loch Ness in Scotland, United Kingdom.DeAgostini

While the myth of the Loch Ness monster goes back hundreds of years, the first modern sighting of Nessie as a "whale-like fish" was reported in 1933.

Since then, there have been thousands of alleged sightings, inspiring numerous books, TV shows and films, and attracting thousands of tourists hoping to catch a glimpse of the elusive monster.

Share this articleComments

You might also like

Loch Ness Monster: Hunters flock to Scotland for the biggest Nessie search in half a century

UN assembly approves resolution granting Palestine new rights

Biden inks €89 billion war aid package to support Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan