03/01/14 16:15 CET
| updated xx mn ago
| updated at xx
It’s one of the viral rumours of the start of 2014: North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is said to have executed his uncle by having him stripped and thrown to a pack of 120 dogs who had previously been starved for three days. It’s also claimed he invited around 300 officials to observe the gruesome hour-long spectacle.
The source for this rumour? Initially a state-run Chinese newspaper supposedly close to the North Korean leadership, the Wen Wei Po, which was then quoted by The Straits Times in Singapore before the story found its way to the Western media. In any case, the rumour is yet to be either confirmed or denied by official North Korean sources. A denial may well come. In the meantime the story has become fodder for some Western commentators as ravenous as Kim’s pack of hounds to chew over whether or not the story – as incredible as it sounds – might in fact be true. After all, this came out of North Korea…
The thing is about North Korea that there is little chance of anyone outside Kim’s inner circle ever really finding out the truth. We are fairly sure that Kim’s uncle, Chang Song Thaek, was executed. We know that Kim said this was the case and that he claimed in a New Year’s message that the ruling party was stronger without his once-powerful relative whom he described as “factional filth.”
There are three possibilities:
1. The story is true. Chang Song Thaek was indeed fed to the dogs.
2. The story is a fabrication ‘Made in China’.
3. The story is a fabrication ‘Made in Pyongyang’.
What is unsettling – apart from the story itself – is that it is nigh on impossible to verify. Perhaps what we should remember is not the dogs but the fact that, in the words of Human Rights Watch “The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) systematically violates the rights of its population.”
And until something is done about it by the UN, or more likely China, we can expect more such stories to find their way to us, whether they be urban myths or grotesque facts.
- 1Groundbreaking study sheds light on Neanderthal life
- 2Germany: #Cutesolidarity response to Kinder chocolate controversy
- 3In the EU ‘one in three deaths of under-75s is avoidable,’ says Eurostat
- 4Hero’s welcome for Ukraine pilot Nadiya Savchenko after Russia prisoner swap
- 5Germany’s carrot and stick approach to refugee integration
- 1The nuclear waste site at the heart of Canada’s wildfires
- 2Turkey warns EU migrant deal could collapse if visa-waiver isn’t speeded up
- 3Eurozone ministers agree “breakthrough” deal with Greece
- 4More fuel frustration as French pickets refuse to back down
- 5Ukrainian pilot Savchenko back in Kyiv after 2 years in Russian jail
- 1EgyptAir crash: airline says Flight MS804 wreckage found
- 2The nuclear waste site at the heart of Canada’s wildfires
- 3Venezuela economy fractured with shortages of essentials across the country
- 4Crimean Tatars look for Eurovision boost on day of national tragedy
- 5Emergency response: inside Ecuador’s disaster zones
US nuclear arsenal controlled on 1970s floppy disks
The UK’s legal high ban: raising more problems than solutions?
Australian town plagued by over 100,000 bats
Powerful Eye Contact Project Aims to Break Down Barriers With Refugees
Germany: #Cutesolidarity response to Kinder chocolate controversy
Wires > News
- 22:03 CET U.N. envoy tells Security Council no Syria talks for 2-3 weeks
- 21:38 CET U.N. panel rejects press freedom watchdog accreditation request
- 21:37 CET Chile’s students clash with police as protests intensify
- 20:56 CET Protester, police officer killed in Congo election protest – U.N.
- 20:26 CET Italy says migrant boat capsized, second in two days
- 20:01 CET Clashes at French protests, union warns of Euro football disruption
- 19:40 CET Son of Equatorial Guinea leader may face French corruption trial
- 19:21 CET Italian mayor breaks with PM’s party over lack of help for migrants