NewsletterNewslettersEventsEventsPodcasts
Loader
Find Us
ADVERTISEMENT

Fact check: Trump's claims about the citizenship question on the census

Image: President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump listens as South Korean President Moon Jae-in speaks in Seoul on June 30, 2019. Copyright Jacquelyn Martin AFP - Getty Images
Copyright Jacquelyn Martin AFP - Getty Images
By Pete Williams with NBC News Politics
Published on
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button

The president's comments come as the administration is trying to figure out a way to include the question.

ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Friday that the census needs to count citizens to determine how many seats a state gets in Congress.

"You need it for many reasons," Trump said. "Number one, you need it for Congress. You need for Congress, for districting. You need it for appropriations, where are the funds going? How many people are there? Are they citizens, are they not citizens? You need it for many reasons."

But apportionment of congressional seats has always been based on a state's total population, not just on the number of citizens.

The Constitutional Convention considered saying that a state's congressional seats would be based on the number of "free citizens and inhabitants" but rejected that in favor of the word "persons."

When Congress was debating the 14th Amendment, which provides further census guidance, it used the term "persons" instead of "citizens" or "voters."

In a 1964 case involving the one-man, one-vote principle, the Supreme Court said, "The debates at the Convention make at least one fact abundantly clear: that when the delegates agreed that the House should represent 'people,' they intended that in allocating congressmen, the number assigned to each state should be determined solely by the number of the state's inhabitants."

Over at least the past century, some efforts have been made in Congress to exclude non-citizens for apportionment purposes, but several of the sponsors have said it would probably require amending the Constitution.

Share this articleComments

You might also like

Five key takeaways from Kamala Harris's DNC speech

Joe Biden given hero's welcome by Democrats as he celebrates Kamala Harris' nomination for president

Who is Tim Walz, Kamala Harris' running mate?