Measures that are rightly being put in place by governments to restrict the spread of COVID-19 are now being used as a means to put an end to our right to protest when they make poor decisions.
A year ago, while monitoring the G7 protests in Biarritz, I was kettled – a tactic to contain crowds - for more than two hours by police under a baking sun. The following day, I was almost choked by tear gas in Bayonne. What I experienced in the southwest of France was part of a heavy-handed police and judicial response to peaceful protest that is being increasingly rolled out across many parts of Europe.
By any standards, 2019 was a remarkable year for protest. Mass movements demanding social, economic, and climate justice swept the streets of Paris, London, Brussels, and scores of other cities. Some states, like France, responded with rubber bullets and tear gas grenades often used illegitimately against protesters. New legislation to fine, arrest, and prosecute people for simply expressing their opinions was introduced. And yet, despite these measures it seemed that protesters were becoming more emboldened to make their voices heard.
But then came the COVID-19 pandemic and with it, many of the rights that we take for granted – such as the right to protest - were necessarily restricted. But if we look carefully at both 2019 and 2020, we see a disturbing common thread. European authorities have not only cracked down on protests in 2019; they have also used the pandemic in 2020 as a smokescreen for pursuing a pattern of silencing dissent.
A report published by Amnesty International finds that a blanket ban on protests following the COVID-19 -lockdown in France, was disproportionate and resulted in hundreds of unjustified fines. But the restrictions on protests since lockdown measures were lifted in France are merely a continuation of a disturbing pattern that has seen peaceful protesters under assault from the police and the justice system.
Thousands of peaceful protesters have been swept up in France’s draconian crackdown on demonstrations, which has seen the authorities weaponise the law to fine, arbitrarily arrest and prosecute protesters violence and have otherwise respected public health measures.
In 2019 alone, French courts convicted more than 21,000 people for offences, such as contempt of public officials and organisation of a protest without complying with notification requirements. These behaviours should never be criminalised.
The crackdown is not unique to France. And neither is the use of the pandemic as a carte blanche to suppress protests.
In the United Kingdom, the Metropolitan police imposed a blanket ban last October against Extinction Rebellion protests, which was later found to be disproportionate by the High Court. Hundreds of peaceful protesters were arrested and prosecuted while the ban was in place.
Extinction Rebellion activists also felt the heavy hand of policing in Brussels in October 2019. The police used force unlawfully and more than 500 protesters were arrested and many more placed in administrative detention.
COVID-19 is not only disrupting our lives but it is also fundamentally changing the context in which people can legitimately express dissent by participating in collective actions.
Countering the pandemic can rightfully justify restrictions on human rights, including the right to peaceful assembly. In a context of lockdown when businesses are closed and freedom of movement is restricted to curb the spread of a highly contagious disease, it is reasonable for governments to inhibit gatherings, including protests. But this should not give carte blanche to governments to enact excessive and disproportionate restrictions without necessary assessments and justifications.
Blanket bans on protests are rarely justifiable, in particular when other lockdown measures that allow people to gather have been eased. In France, for example, the government kept a ban on protests attended by more than ten people but allowed larger gatherings to go ahead on public transport and places open to the public. It was clear that the government’s intention was to silence protesters, not to protect public health. As a result, dozens of protesters were fined.
This also summer saw heavy-handed policing of Black Lives Matter protests around Europe, with protesters in London being charged with horses and kettled.
In Poland, law enforcement officials have used the pandemic as an excuse to fine protesters even when they were complying with public health restrictions, like wearing facial coverings and keeping physical distance.
European authorities have an arsenal of weapons at their disposal to crack down on protests. European police forces often carry dangerous weapons, such as rubber bullets and tear gas grenades, and prosecutors and courts use vague laws to silence peaceful dissent.
Speaking one’s mind, critically challenging government decisions, and protesting peacefully, are a vital part of a healthy, free society. They offer an outlet to express hopes for the future and demand a better world.
Nobody should be brutalised or bullied into feeling afraid to protest.
In pre-pandemic times, the arrests and prosecutions of peaceful protesters had a chilling effect on many activists. The danger is that, with COVID-19 here to stay, many European countries will continue to use the pandemic as a moment to further chip away rights and stifle dissent.
- Marco Peronlini is a Senior Researcher at Amnesty International focused on human rights in Europe
Are you a recognised expert in your field? At Euronews, we believe all views matter. Contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org to send pitches or submissions and be part of the conversation.