Find Us

WTO tussles over hard stop vs phase-out of appeals system

WTO tussles over hard stop vs phase-out of appeals system
FILE PHOTO: A logo is pictured outside the World Trade Organization (WTO) headquarters next to a red traffic light in Geneva, Switzerland, October 2, 2018. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse Copyright Denis Balibouse(Reuters)
Copyright Denis Balibouse(Reuters)
By Reuters
Published on Updated
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button

GENEVA (Reuters) - The World Trade Organization (WTO) battled on Tuesday over whether to bring its Appellate Body to an abrupt halt or allow its adjudicators to settle a handful of pending cases, according to trade officials present at a meeting on the subject.

The Trump administration has for more than two years been blocking appointments to the top body that rules on trade disputes, which means that after Dec. 10 it will have too few members to function.

The mandates of two of the three Appellate Body's members end on that date.

David Walker, New Zealand's ambassador who chairs the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB), proposed to WTO members that the Appellate Body should be allowed to conclude three cases that have already held hearings, trade officials said. A further 10 pending appeals are to be left in limbo.

However, even that limited case load drew an objection from U.S. ambassador Dennis Shea at the meeting, they said.

It appeared that "no consensus" would be reached by Dec. 10 on how to deal with pending appeals, officials quoted Shea as saying.

The European Union (EU) told the talks that the impasse was undermining the dispute settlement system, while China's delegation said the "illegal blockade" by Washington had resulted in an unprecedented number of pending appeals, trade officials said.

The three appeals for which hearings have been completed are a combined case on Australia's plain packaging for tobacco products, one on Russian measures to limit imports of railway equipment filed by Ukraine, and another concerning U.S. anti-subsidy duties on paper from Canada.

The proposal would mean that no appeal could be heard in a WTO panel decision on Monday on subsidies for EU planemaker Airbus.

Two appeals brought by the United States will also not be settled.

(Reporting by Stephanie Nebehay; editing by Philip Blenkinsop and Ed Osmond)

Share this articleComments

You might also like