This content is not available in your region

Machines or trees? Which are better for taking CO2 out of the atmosphere?

euronews_icons_loading
A tree plantation near Cremona in Italy
A tree plantation near Cremona in Italy   -   Copyright  Wilks, Jeremy/
By Jeremy Wilks

If we're going to slow down global warming scientists say we're actually going to have to take billions of tonnes of CO2 out of the atmosphere.

So how do we do it? Plant trees or use machines?

Machine technology is expensive

Let's start with machines.

There’s a sci-fi-looking plant that is working away right now, literally sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere.

It's from a Swiss company called ClimeWorks and it's located in Iceland.

The machines use renewable geothermal energy, and the CO2 is pumped underground and eventually becomes rock:

This new technology is expensive.

The demonstration plant cost 10 million euros to build and can capture 4,000 tonnes of CO2 per year.

That's 2500 euros per tonne, if you assume that the plant will be only active for one year. Climeworks doesn't give an official figure per tonne for the plant in question, and says the plant will be operational for much longer than 12 months.

In any case, it's pricey technology at the moment, but it has lots of political and business support, and once scaled up the price could drop to 150 euros a tonne.

Land suitable for tree planting is limited

Lots of environmentalists dislike industrial carbon capture technology, and many argue we should just plant trees - natural carbon capture machines.

But you really need a lot of them to compensate for our emissions.

When we have exhausted all emission reduction and fixation options, trees are a great ally.
Diego Florian
FSC Italia

An average tree contains about a tonne of CO2, and the average European emits 5 to 7 tonnes of CO2 per year.

So you'd need to plant 5-7 trees every year from now onwards for the rest of your life to offset your emissions.

Do we even have enough land for those trees? Not really, not if we want to grow food, too.

In fact those that promote responsible forestry say planting trees has to be seen as a kind of top-up option once the reduction of emissions has been maximized.

“When we have exhausted all emission reduction and fixation options, trees are a great ally,” says Diego Florian from FSC Italia.

So we need both trees and machines, but most of all reduced energy demand and a switch to clean power.