Euronews is no longer accessible on Internet Explorer. This browser is not updated by Microsoft and does not support the last technical evolutions. We encourage you to use another browser, such as Edge, Safari, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Lawsuit over politically 'slanted' Trump wildlife board can proceed - judge

Lawsuit over politically 'slanted' Trump wildlife board can proceed - judge
FILE PHOTO: A grizzly bear and her two cubs approach the carcass of a bison in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, United States, July 6, 2015. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart/File Photo/File Photo -
Jim Urquhart(Reuters)
Euronews logo
Text size Aa Aa

By Jonathan Stempel

NEWYORK (Reuters) – A federal judge has rejected the Trump administration’s bid to dismiss a lawsuit by animal rights groups seeking to dissolve a wildlife advisory board they said was stacked with politically connected donors and pro-hunting enthusiasts.

U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan in Manhattan said on Monday that the administration has not shown that its International Wildlife Conservation Council served the public interest, having justified it with “boilerplate” language rather than the required “reasoned explanation.”

She also said the plaintiffs could try to prove that the 17-person board was not “fairly balanced” to incorporate different points of view, reflecting what they called its lack of scientists, economists and wildlife conservation experts.

A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in Manhattan, whose office defended the government, declined to comment.

The lawsuit was filed in August 2018 by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Humane Society.

They said the wildlife board created in November 2017 by then-Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke was “slanted” to promote “trophy hunting” and the importing of body parts from “imperilled species” such as African elephants, lions and rhinos.

The groups also said the board violated a federal law curbing White House use of “secretive” advisory panels to set national policy, and caused harm by forcing them to devote resources to monitoring the board.

Lawyers for the groups had no immediate comment.

In seeking a dismissal, the administration said the groups lacked standing to sue, having suffered at most a setback to their “abstract social interests,” and could not litigate what was essentially a policy disagreement.

Nathan dismissed one claim involving a recordkeeping issue.

Zinke resigned as Interior Secretary last December. He had said the wildlife board would advise on the benefits of recreational hunting, including “boosting economies and creating hundreds of jobs to enhancing wildlife conservation.”

U.S. President Donald Trump’s adult sons are trophy hunters.

The case is Natural Resources Defense Council et al v Zinke et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 18-06903.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Howard Goller)

euronews provides breaking news articles from reuters as a service to its readers, but does not edit the articles it publishes. Articles appear on for a limited time.