This content is not available in your region

Aircraft, night-vision goggles and drones: The US war chest left behind in the hands of the Taliban

FILE-A US military helicopter is pictured flying above the US embassy in Kabul on August 15, 2021.
FILE-A US military helicopter is pictured flying above the US embassy in Kabul on August 15, 2021.   -   Copyright  WAKIL KOHSAR/AFP   -  
By Euronews, Reuters

About a month ago, Afghanistan's ministry of defence posted on social media photographs of seven brand new helicopters arriving in Kabul delivered by the United States.

"They'll continue to see a steady drumbeat of that kind of support, going forward," US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters a few days later at the Pentagon.

In a matter of weeks, however, the Taliban had seized most of the country, as well as any weapons and equipment left behind by fleeing Afghan forces.

Video footage showed the advancing insurgents inspecting long lines of vehicles and opening crates of new firearms, communications gear, and even military drones.

"Everything that hasn't been destroyed is the Taliban's now," one US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Reuters.

Current and former US officials say there is concern those weapons could be used to kill civilians, be seized by other militant groups, such as Islamic State, to attack US interests in the region, or even potentially be handed over to adversaries including China and Russia.

President Joe Biden's administration is so concerned about the weapons that it is considering a number of options to pursue.

The officials said launching airstrikes against the larger equipment, such as helicopters, has not been ruled out, but there is concern that would antagonise the Taliban at a time the United States' main goal is evacuating people.

Another official said that while there are no definitive numbers yet, the current intelligence assessment was that the Taliban are believed to control more than 2,000 armoured vehicles, including US Humvees, and up to 40 aircraft potentially including UH-60 Black Hawks, scout attack helicopters, and ScanEagle military drones.

"We have already seen Taliban fighters armed with US-made weapons they seized from the Afghan forces. This poses a significant threat to the United States and our allies," Representative Michael McCaul, the top Republican on the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, told Reuters in an email.

'More like trophies'

The speed with which the Taliban swept across Afghanistan is reminiscent of Islamic State militants taking weapons from US-supplied Iraqi forces who offered little resistance in 2014.

Between 2002 and 2017, the United States gave the Afghan military an estimated $28 billion (€23 billion) in weaponry, including guns, rockets, night-vision goggles, and even small drones for intelligence gathering.

But aircraft like the Blackhawk helicopters have been the most visible sign of US military assistance and were supposed to be the Afghan military's biggest advantage over the Taliban.

SHAH MARAI/AFP - File 2011
File-A US soldier and Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers look at military equipment during a weapons exhibition of military equipment donated to the ANA by the United States.SHAH MARAI/AFP - File 2011

Between 2003 and 2016 the United States provided Afghan forces with 208 aircraft, according to the US Government Accountability Office (GAO).

In the last week, many of those aircraft were most useful for Afghan pilots to escape the Taliban.

One of the US officials said that between 40 and 50 aircraft had been flown to Uzbekistan by Afghan pilots seeking refuge. Even before taking power in Kabul over the weekend, the Taliban had started a campaign of assassinating pilots.

Some planes were in the United States for maintenance and will stay. Those en route to Afghan forces will instead be used by the US military to help in the evacuation from Kabul.

Current and former officials say that while they are concerned about the Taliban having access to the helicopters, the aircraft requires frequent maintenance and many are complicated to fly without extensive training.

"Ironically, the fact that our equipment breaks down so often is a life-saver here," a third official said.

Retired US Army General Joseph Votel, who oversaw US military operations in Afghanistan as head of US Central Command from 2016 to 2019, said most of the high-end hardware captured by the Taliban, including the aircraft, was not equipped with sensitive US technology.

"In some cases, some of these will be more like trophies," Votel said.

Fighting at night

There is a more immediate concern about some of the easier-to-use weapons and equipment, such as night-vision goggles.

Since 2003, the United States has provided Afghan forces with at least 600,000 infantry weapons including M16 assault rifles, 162,000 pieces of communication equipment, and 16,000 night-vision goggle devices.

"The ability to operate at night is a real game-changer," one congressional aide told Reuters.

Votel and others said smalls arms seized by the insurgents such as machine guns, mortars, as well as artillery pieces including howitzers, could give the Taliban an advantage against any resistance that could surface in historic anti-Taliban strongholds such as the Panjshir Valley northeast of Kabul.

US officials said the expectation was that most of the weapons would be used by the Taliban themselves, but it was far too early to tell what they planned to do - including possibly sharing the equipment with rival states such as China.

File- Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers sit on the top of a Russian-made T62 tank during a weapons exhibition of military equipment donated to the ANA by the US and othersSHAH MARAI/AFP/ 2011

Andrew Small, a Chinese foreign policy expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, said the Taliban was likely to grant Beijing access to any US weapons they may now have control over.

One of the US officials said it was not likely China would gain much because Beijing likely already has access to the weapons and equipment.

The situation, experts say, shows the United States needs a better way to monitor the equipment it gives to allies. It could have done much more to ensure those supplies to Afghan forces were closely monitored and inventoried, said Justine Fleischner of UK-based Conflict Armament Research.

"But the time has passed for these efforts to have any impact in Afghanistan," Fleischner said.