U.S. Senate will not 'poke the bear' Trump by passing tariff measure - lawmaker

U.S. Senate will not 'poke the bear' Trump by passing tariff measure - lawmaker
Copyright 
By Reuters
Share this articleComments
Share this articleClose Button

By Patricia Zengerle

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Bob Corker accused his fellow Republicans of being afraid to stand up to President Donald Trump on Tuesday, as his legislation to block the president's ability to impose tariffs on national security grounds hit a roadblock in Congress.

"'We might poke the bear' is the language I have been hearing in the hallways," Corker said in an emotional Senate speech. "The president might get upset with us as United States senators if we vote on the Corker amendment, so we're going to do everything we can to block it."

Corker and other lawmakers - Democrats as well as some of Trump's fellow Republicans - introduced the measure last week after the president's recent announcement that he was considering tariffs on automobiles, after imposing tariffs on steel and aluminium, citing national security concerns.

Trump, who campaigned on a pledge to negotiate better trade deals to bring back U.S. manufacturing jobs, has pursued aggressive measures against trading partners from China to Canada, Mexico and U.S. allies in Europe.

This has worried some lawmakers who strongly back principles of free trade, warning that Trump could trigger a trade war that would destabilise the economy and ultimately hurt American workers.

Corker's amendment would have pared back Trump's authority under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose tariffs on national security grounds without obtaining Congress' consent.

Its backers had hoped for a Senate vote as soon as this week by including the legislation as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for 2019, or NDAA, a sweeping defence policy bill that Congress passes every year.

But Senator James Inhofe, the Republican who is managing debate on the defence bill, blocked the amendment as inappropriate for the legislation, preventing a vote.

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; editing by Jonathan Oatis)

Share this articleComments

You might also like