03/05/13 15:03 CET
| updated xx mn ago
| updated at xx
Kitsch doesn’t always come cheap. And as they don’t come much more kitsch than the Eurovision Song Contest, putting on the event can be quite an expensive undertaking. Last year’s hosts, Azerbaijan, spent an estimated 34 million euros on the show, not counting the 75 million euros cost of a spanking new concert venue, which at least remains as part of the legacy.
The end of extravagance?
The ongoing European economic crisis will make this year’s Contest less lavish. Sweden – this year’s organisers – have announced severe budget cuts that will bring visual production spending down to below 15 million euros, half the amount splashed out by Azerbaijan.
The changes are not only driven by financial pressures. Organisers hope to bring back those nations hardest-hit by austerity and aspire to make the event, which attracted 125 million viewers last year, more intimate and more focused on the music.
The temptation to try and outdo rival countries with the latest technologies and glamorous effects has contributed to the inflated production costs. Consequently the role of ‘host’ has become a heavy burden. Countries once the backbone of Eurovision have had to abandon the contest: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Poland, Portugal and Slovakia won’t be sending participants this year. They simply can’t afford to run the risk of winning.
According to Martin Osterdahl, the 2013 Contest’s executive producer, “The survival of the Eurovision contest depends on the small nations’ hosting ability…Someone has to break the trend” he said.
Less is More
The Swedes’ readiness to be the ones to “break the trend” is itself perhaps the reason it remains one of Europe’s most stable economies. Even last year’s winning performance by Loreen was relatively austere: she managed to win over the audience by voice and song alone, and without expensive or extravagant effects.
Similarly, Sweden will spend less on lighting, use a smaller venue, hold fewer rehearsals and propose less lavish receptions. There will be less extravagance to draw the attention away from the songs and the performances themselves.
Organisers hope to prove that you don’t have to be rich to be kitsch.
- 1G7 says ‘global growth is our urgent priority’
- 2Third night of riots rock Barcelona’s Gràcia district
- 3New video footage: overcrowded migrant boat capsizing
- 4French labour reform action threatens to disrupt Euro 2016 fans
- 5Leaders ‘influenced Putin’ over Savchenko release, say Ukraine pilot’s lawyers
- 1Groundbreaking study sheds light on Neanderthal life
- 2Germany: #Cutesolidarity response to Kinder chocolate controversy
- 3In the EU ‘one in three deaths of under-75s is avoidable,’ says Eurostat
- 4Germany’s carrot and stick approach to refugee integration
- 5Hero’s welcome for Ukraine pilot Nadiya Savchenko after Russia prisoner swap
Wires > News
- 17:54 CET Florence fines Uffizi Gallery director for ticket tout warning
- 17:03 CET Five jailed for life in Uganda for al Shabaab World Cup bombings
- 16:52 CET Thai queen undergoes medical tests, palace says in rare statement
- 16:46 CET Freed by Russia, Ukraine’s ‘Joan of Arc’ may prove thorn in own…
- 16:34 CET Europe steps up North Korea sanctions with oil, finance bans
- 16:24 CET Russia says U.S. ‘delays’ with joint Syria action may hit peace…
- 16:20 CET South Africa to review spending on luxury vehicles for Zuma’s wives
- 16:06 CET Syrian president denies media report of new Russian-drafted…